PROGRAM IDENTIFICATION DATA
EVALUATION CATEGORIES AND CRITERIA
OTHER INFORMATION
Below is a form that I created. This may help you decide the criteria for your form development.
EDUCATIONAL SOFTWARE EVALUATION - Dr. Jim Kerr
| Title:
Company: Address: |
Price:
One User=> Site Licence=> NOTES: |
| Type of Computer: | Peripherals: |
| Subject Area:
Frequency of Use: ¡ daily ¡ weekly ¡ other: |
Delivery Methods:
¡ lessons/tutorial ¡ drill ¡ review ¡ simulation ¡ testing ¡ other: |
| Use with: ¡
primary
¡ Class ¡ junior ¡ Small Group ¡ intermediate ¡ Individual ¡ secondary ¡ without teacher ¡ other: |
|
| Rating Code: 5-excellent 4-good 3-satisfactory 2-fair 1-poor | |
| Educational Value and Pedagogy
1) Program is flexible for intended user(s) 5 4 3 2 1 2) Appropriate for classroom setting 5 4 3 2 1 3) Meets relevant educational needs 5 4 3 2 1 4) New terms are defined 5 4 3 2 1 5) Student has chance to correct errors 5 4 3 2 1 6) Help is available 5 4 3 2 1 7) Material is presented clearly and interestingly 5 4 3 2 1 8) Branches to new information, reviews old information and adjusts feedback 5 4 3 2 1 9) Follows progression of skills 5 4 3 2 1 10) Student response input is in a familiar manner 5 4 3 2 1 11) Student advances at appropriate speed 5 4 3 2 1 12) Criteria for advancing can be adjusted by teacher 5 4 3 2 1 |
|
| Ease of Use
1) Clear, complete teacher documentation 5 4 3 2 1 2) Clear, complete student documentation 5 4 3 2 1 3) Instructions can be bypassed 5 4 3 2 1 4) Easy to exit from program 5 4 3 2 1 5) Easy to set up program 5 4 3 2 1 |
|
| Effective Use of Computer
1) Computer presentation is more effective/efficient than other methods 5 4 3 2 1 2) Video display is pleasing and functional 5 4 3 2 1 3) Audio is effective 5 4 3 2 1 4) Other peripherals are employed when needed 5 4 3 2 1 5) Computer maintains useful information for records 5 4 3 2 1 |
|
| ***SUMMARY EVALUATION*** Excellent Good Satisfactory Fair Poor | |
| Comments: Please use the other side of the page | |